A fixation on system change alone opens the door to a kind of cynical self-absolution that divorces personal commitment from political belief. This is its own kind of false consciousness, one that threatens to create a cheapened climate politics incommensurate with this urgent moment.

[…]

Because here’s the thing: When you choose to eat less meat or take the bus instead of driving or have fewer children, you are making a statement that your actions matter, that it’s not too late to avert climate catastrophe, that you have power. To take a measure of personal responsibility for climate change doesn’t have to distract from your political activism—if anything, it amplifies it.

  • @then_three_more
    link
    12 hours ago

    "We” as in consumers don’t use enough to hurt companies by divesting.

    I think you’re confused by what divesting is. That’s us as business owners, not as customers (obviously we as customers can hit them simultaneously from the other side too).

    Yes, individually it doesn’t hurt them much, but it becomes the death of a thousand cuts.

    If you can put pressure on your pension provider, local government, church, favourite charity or any other organisation you care about to drop funds with them in entirely then all the better.

    By all means do anything you can to reduce your individual carbon footprint

    Divesting is not to do with that, it’s about hitting these companies right in the share price.