• @TheTetrapod
    link
    English
    63 months ago

    As someone in the inside, what’s the rationale behind having to publicly post jobs like this? Why can’t you just offer the job to the person you want to give it to?

    • @AstridWipenaugh
      link
      English
      11
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s because of anti-discrimination laws. In some US states it can be illegal to hire someone for a position without posting it publicly. The concern is that if you’re not posting the job publicly, it can be because you want to prevent certain people from applying.

      When you do post it publicly, the company can demonstrate that they allowed anyone to apply, show records that they considered multiple people for the job, and then decided on the internal candidate as the best fit. No room for a discrimination lawsuit.

      Source: I’m a hiring manager at a multi-billion dollar company and have actually learned a thing or two from annual compliance training over the years.

      • @AeonFelis
        link
        English
        43 months ago

        In other words - like 99% of the laws: good publicity intentions meets reality.

    • @Norin
      link
      English
      93 months ago

      In academia (my line of work) they’re required to have positions posted and open for a certain amount of time, interview a certain number of applicants, etc.

      In theory, it’s for equal opportunity and finding the best person for the job.

      In practice, it’s a waste of time, money, and hope.

    • @EtherWhack
      link
      English
      33 months ago

      Likely corporate and/or legal politics. I would imagine things not unlike EEOP loopholing would play a big role in it. (Yes, gov’ment we are offering this opening to “anyone”. So, send that funding check right over)