@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 18 hours agoJazz handsmander.xyzimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1464arrow-down121
arrow-up1443arrow-down1imageJazz handsmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 18 hours agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squareTar_AlcaranlinkfedilinkEnglish43•17 hours agoBut Geiger counters aren’t rhythmic at all, radioactive decay is, pretty famously, random.
minus-square@theilleistslinkEnglish2•5 hours agoRhythmic? No, not really. More exciting if the musician could somehow anticipate this fundamentally unpredictable event? Absolutely.
minus-square@lemonmelonlinkEnglish25•17 hours agoTrue, much like memes are pretty famously fabricated.
minus-square@eran_moradlinkEnglish3•17 hours agoFollows a Poisson distribution. I guess one could call that random.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•16 hours agoWell, its random, like… by definition.
But Geiger counters aren’t rhythmic at all, radioactive decay is, pretty famously, random.
Rhythmic? No, not really. More exciting if the musician could somehow anticipate this fundamentally unpredictable event? Absolutely.
… Jazz.
/S
True, much like memes are pretty famously fabricated.
Follows a Poisson distribution. I guess one could call that random.
Well, its random, like… by definition.