• oce 🐆
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63 months ago

    I think it’s more about asking it the steps to create a bomb or how to disrupt the grid, for example, where to cut the major edges.

    • AwesomeLowlander
      link
      fedilink
      English
      153 months ago

      asking it the steps to create a bomb

      That sounds like a self-correcting issue right there

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
        link
        English
        163 months ago

        That, and the Internet has been teaching people how to create bombs since the dial-up days. I don’t predict that LLM’s will be either a benefit or a detriment to that particular strain of natural selection.

        • AwesomeLowlander
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          Is it more of a public safety issue than if they actually build a working one from a legit bomb manual and deploy it?

          • oce 🐆
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 months ago

            No, but I think it could make the knowledge more easily available which increases the risk that it may happen.

              • oce 🐆
                link
                fedilink
                English
                13 months ago

                I think I heard about it before, but instead of having to remember that, I could just ask an uncensored LLM.

                • AwesomeLowlander
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  33 months ago

                  The actual point was, bomb making instructions have been floating around on search engine results since the days of dial up. That particular manuscript itself has existed since before the days of the Internet. There’s nothing cgpt could give you that you couldn’t have found by typing the same query into Google. Getting the instructions is literally the easiest, least effort, least risk part of building a bomb.