These were posted within minutes of each other.

  • @Sanctus
    link
    English
    24
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Everyone is saying neutral while the Vance headline uses powerful titles like Second-in-Command, while calling Waltz an ex football coach lmao. But sure neutral it is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 hours ago

      Yes, but is “second in command” a good term or a bad term? It could mean someone who is part of a strong, structured leadership. Or it could mean someone who is running for a military dictatorship

      Same with “football coach”. It could be a weak or simple leader without decent political experience. Or it could be a man of the people, relatable and connected to society.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 hours ago

      The Harris-Walz campaign is specifically amplifying his hometown roots in their own messaging… It’s how they want us to view him. I’d say it’d be more biased if the article painted him as nothing but a seasoned politician.

      • @Sanctus
        link
        English
        05 hours ago

        I could see that approach. I guess what I’m most upset about is the attempt at shoeing strengths of current Republican leaders. Maybe the real issue I take is I see not one positive quality of the opposition and dont understand how any reputable source could attempt.to find one.