@Rapidcreek to politics • 5 months agoDems privately worry how Walz will fare against Vance in VP debatewww.politico.commessage-square14arrow-up18arrow-down137
arrow-up1-29arrow-down1external-linkDems privately worry how Walz will fare against Vance in VP debatewww.politico.com@Rapidcreek to politics • 5 months agomessage-square14
minus-square@jordanlundMlink12•5 months agoWalz will do fine, the issue is that the bar is incredibly low for Vance. If he can stay on policy, not shit himself over the immigrants eating cats thing, he’ll over-perform.
minus-squareBilliamlink9•5 months agoThe bar for Vance is literally “repeat Republican lies and fear-mongering, but do it coherently.” Since he’s not gonna be fact-checked, that’s all he has to do.
minus-square@jordanlundMlink2•5 months agoHe won’t be fact checked by the moderators, that still leaves him open for Walz.
minus-square@AbidanYrelinkEnglish5•5 months ago the bar is incredibly low for Vance. Act vaguely human. Will he be able to pull it off?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•5 months agoHow many flies will land on his head? Will he eat one, purposefully or accidentally?
Walz will do fine, the issue is that the bar is incredibly low for Vance.
If he can stay on policy, not shit himself over the immigrants eating cats thing, he’ll over-perform.
The bar for Vance is literally “repeat Republican lies and fear-mongering, but do it coherently.”
Since he’s not gonna be fact-checked, that’s all he has to do.
He won’t be fact checked by the moderators, that still leaves him open for Walz.
Act vaguely human.
Will he be able to pull it off?
How many flies will land on his head? Will he eat one, purposefully or accidentally?