Yes, but is “second in command” a good term or a bad term? It could mean someone who is part of a strong, structured leadership. Or it could mean someone who is running for a military dictatorship
Same with “football coach”. It could be a weak or simple leader without decent political experience. Or it could be a man of the people, relatable and connected to society.
Yes, but is “second in command” a good term or a bad term? It could mean someone who is part of a strong, structured leadership. Or it could mean someone who is running for a military dictatorship
Same with “football coach”. It could be a weak or simple leader without decent political experience. Or it could be a man of the people, relatable and connected to society.
I said strong, not good. That title speaks from authority, “there is only one above you.”