• @rdri
    link
    English
    14 hours ago

    a war they started.

    There are chances the outcome would be different if hamas released hostages, or didn’t attack Israel on October 7th. Those things were not smart. It didn’t serve any good purpose. A smarter thing would have been to prepare for such an attack from Israel by building defenses to protect civilians at the very least.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      No there are not, this has been ongoing for decades and decades. Things would not have magically improved, it would have continued to be a slow death sentence whilst the world ignored it.

      What Hamas did, no matter how tragic, has done more to bring light and international support to the plight of the Palestinian peoples and exposed Israel as the monster it is than anything else ever has.

      • @rdri
        link
        English
        150 minutes ago

        That didn’t worth it in my opinion. The level of international support is nowhere enough. And again, they could build defenses to decrease the number of victims.

        Also the premise of “Israel is a monster” sentiment is hugely weakened by the monstrosity of the October attack itself.

        • @DonjonMaester
          link
          English
          138 minutes ago

          No it’s not. More than one side can be monstrous in a conflict. “Yeah well but they did X so it’s okay that we did Y” is bible level reasoning aka no reasoning and pretty much what is causing the whole thing anyway.