• abff08f4813c
    link
    fedilink
    216 hours ago

    Not denying that there are problems, but this particular rule isn’t unique to the US.

    See Canada, https://www.unhcr.ca/in-canada/seeking-asylum-in-canada/

    To apply for asylum, you must be physically present in Canada or be seeking entry into the country at a port of entry

    And Sweden, https://help.unhcr.org/sweden/asylum/

    Please note that you must be in the territory of Sweden, or at a port of entry (an airport, land border crossing check point or seaport) before you can apply for asylum in Sweden.

    That being the case, I guess I’m curious as to why this seems to be the international norm, and why countries seem to shy away in general from the idea that you are proposing (or perhaps I’m mistaken and there are countries which have already adopted your idea - in which case I’d be even more curious to see how it’s been going for them).

    • @jordanlundM
      link
      114 hours ago

      Canada likely doesn’t have the same sort of problem because immigrants from other countries would either have to come in by plane or boat, or would have to enter the US first.

      Same deal with Sweden, they don’t share a border with a country from which people are fleeing.