It all started with the unofficial godot discord admin dealing with some chuds and people turning their ire towards the Godot Foundation staff instead.

Since Godot has stubbornly remained on the Xitter nazi bar as a valid space for PR and social media interaction and dared to promote the Wokot hashtag and reiterate their progessiveness, the reactionaries infesting that space are now piling on their socials and harassing everyone they can get their eyes on.

Examples

Anyway, solidarity with the targets of harassment. I hope they finally realize that Xitter is a lost cause.

Update: Godot is being review-bombed

Fortunately the reactionary backlash seems to be having the opposite effect

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This is a pretty common challenge in philosophy with a very obvious solution:

    Define the controversial word (or words) at the top. It’s done all the time in science articles or legal documents.

    You can even compound it to point out it’s your version (like calling it Lefty-woke).

    By avoiding it, imo, you let them win and “claim” the word, since in their worldview, everyone is now using it like them.

    Having said that, this is just my approach, I think the issue with politics is that people assume everyone is using the same language. You got to affirm or confirm that first.

    Also, ironically, I think we are talking about the same thing, just using different words lol.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      I hear you. It’s no good to just cede ownership of a word and allow others to define it however suits them. But… it’s Twitter, getting into a good faith philosophical discussion about the definitions of words ain’t going to happen, so in many cases it’s better to just not bring up the controversial words at all. Guess there’s pros and cons to each.

    • @Duamerthrax
      link
      22 months ago

      Sometimes people have different definitions of the same word.

      Except you’re dealing with the character limit of twitter. It’s not really a platform for complex discussions and greatly favors simpler, more extreme views. If you’re spending the limited character limit and attention span of your audience on dictionary definitions, you’re doing it wrong. It’s better to be simple, but precise and not to get bogged down in the lexicon.