If you dig deep enough you’ll find some blatant racist shit in one of the conservative comms too, unless it got nuked by a mod. I don’t really care enough to go digging for it either.
You love this line, it’s your go to NPC response. You may not have written the article, but by posting it, you are promoting it.
You’ll gish gallop around that fact, I’m sure. But you constantly post inflammatory articles and then claim that it’s okay because you didn’t write the article. It’s not okay, and you’re supporting the misleading and inflammatory content by doing that (but of course, you already know that).
But I’ve posted articles that are critical of Trump, Stein, and Harris, as well as articles praising each of them.
So, if you’re assuming I agree with every viewpoint in the articles I post, how does that even work when I share so many conflicting perspectives?!
I also created and mod a political news community where people have posted articles praising Harris, criticizing Stein, and trashing me—yet I still leave those up.
Right on schedule! Just as predictable as a broken record player.
Idk man. I usually read the articles I post and make sure to understand them before I go spamming. And I don’t post intentionally false and misleading articles to communities with the somewhat transparent optics of trying to stir up shit. If you aren’t understanding what your posting, you are at best unintentionally damaging honest discourse… but I think we both know your “playing dumb” act is a farce.
If you dig deep enough you’ll find some blatant racist shit in one of the conservative comms too, unless it got nuked by a mod. I don’t really care enough to go digging for it either.
Edit: oh here it is
(This is blatantly false, nothing in the law states this, it was doctored up by racists to drive immigrant hate)
Do a search and they’ve posted like 10 other articles to the conservative comm as well.
And also prempting Mr Monk as I know what he’ll say: “I only post the articles!!!1!11!”. Sure buddy. Sure.
I didn’t write that article though.
And it was written by the New York Post. If you have issues with the article, take it up with them.
You love this line, it’s your go to NPC response. You may not have written the article, but by posting it, you are promoting it.
You’ll gish gallop around that fact, I’m sure. But you constantly post inflammatory articles and then claim that it’s okay because you didn’t write the article. It’s not okay, and you’re supporting the misleading and inflammatory content by doing that (but of course, you already know that).
But I’ve posted articles that are critical of Trump, Stein, and Harris, as well as articles praising each of them.
So, if you’re assuming I agree with every viewpoint in the articles I post, how does that even work when I share so many conflicting perspectives?!
I also created and mod a political news community where people have posted articles praising Harris, criticizing Stein, and trashing me—yet I still leave those up.
https://lemmy.world/c/politicsunfiltered
So how does this work with your theory? Is everyone here who posts a news article, “promoting”?
Right on schedule! Just as predictable as a broken record player.
Idk man. I usually read the articles I post and make sure to understand them before I go spamming. And I don’t post intentionally false and misleading articles to communities with the somewhat transparent optics of trying to stir up shit. If you aren’t understanding what your posting, you are at best unintentionally damaging honest discourse… but I think we both know your “playing dumb” act is a farce.
Have a good weekend.