Employers added 254,000 jobs in September, blowing away forecasts and reversing a slowdown in hiring that had prompted the Federal Reserve to make a jumbo rate cut at its meeting last month.

Economists had forecast 140,000 new jobs, according to financial data provider FactSet.

The unemployment rate inched down to 4.1%, versus 4.2% in the prior month.

  • slazer2au
    link
    English
    114 months ago

    How many pay livable wages too.

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      64 months ago

      Can a job be “good” without a livable wage?

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          They are fishing for desperate people… this was their MO for generations. We are undergoing demographic change and this dynamic is not tenable going forward with out mass migration, which has trippled since COVID but still not enough.

          Either way, skill up and get money… that’s the only way to get ahead. Don’t settle for shit wage and if you have, then switch ASAP .

            • sunzu2
              link
              fedilink
              24 months ago

              niche and low pay? must be delusional owner lol but older ones don’t understand new market and you are prolly right abou some old timer enabling it.

              but under these facts, owner will have to adjust. if job requires skills, owner must pay!

                • sunzu2
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 months ago

                  Maybe, maybe not.

                  But why should a worker worry about owner’s business model. I think worker should start thinking more like owner, ie owner of their labour…

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        English
        14 months ago

        If your in high school and work 12 hours a week…maybe?

          • FuglyDuck
            link
            English
            14 months ago

            recognizing that HS students frequently have different perspectives (and limited options as far as jobs go,) is boomer logic?

            Further if you’re only working 12 hours, a livable wage needs to be more than 3x the pay rate of somebody working 40, and for those jobs, you’d be competing with everyone in retail hell to get. And to be blunt, at least in MN, the regulatory scheduling requirements for people under 18 tend to make scheduling students annoying. (like, seriously. it basically makes a normal shift rotation impossible. throw in school or social things; and many managers just decide it’s not worth it… unless the job is such that they’re desperate for anyone with a pulse.) (not the kid’s fault mind. but yeah, it’s seriously inconvenient for basically everyone except people delivering newspapers. because they have carve outs for some reason. Oh. Right. Star Tribune lobbied our legislature for them.)

            • sunzu2
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              This is a market transaction… Why is workers age or family situatiom is a factor here?

              Who benefits from the child being underpaid?

              • FuglyDuck
                link
                English
                1
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Uhm, that’s where you went? First off it’s pretty obvious who benefits, but generally speaking, in places that hire high school kids and adults in a mixed setting, everyone gets the same pay. They’re being “under” paid relatively because they usually work fewer hours.

                Most unskilled labor the rates are known before you ever apply, and that’s what they offer. You try and negotiate a better wage they’re going to laugh and move on to the next.

                As for why their age is a factor at all? Because state and federal regulations make it a factor. There’s a lot of limitations on when, where and how long minors can work.

                And unless you go in for child labor… that’s usually a good thing.