• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -62 months ago

    See you’re doing the thing where you insist it isn’t sexual, despite it clearly being sexual for many, maybe not for you, but in essence you’re attempting to gaslight me by pretending it’s on me for “sexualizing” people doing shit like this which is clearly meant to be sexual. Like, just look up “furries” and scroll around images, a decent amount are going to be vaguely creepily sexual like that, or whatever the fuck this is. But yeah, that’s all my imagination, right lmao.

    By the way I forgot to mention that an insignificant portion of them are like, actual literal nazis, but add that to the list. Knew I was forgetting something.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The hilarious thing about your argument is that it applies to cisgender heterosexual white men better than it does to furries.

      Not that it was a good argument in the first place, it seems like you are unable to confront how narrow your view of the world is.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -12 months ago

        I’ve said multiple times that this applies to all people, I even included an example of a straight couple exhibiting similarly creepy behaviors in my very first comment.

        Frankly it only applies “more” in that there are more “straight people” than furries (which, by the way, is not a sexual orientation. First of all if YOU are to be believed “it isn’t sexual” so how the fuck can it be a sexual orientation? Hmm? And second of all there are gay furries and straight furries etc, the sexual orientation is separate from the type of BDSM, latex, fursuit, or leather dog mask and chain an you’re wearing.)

        Narrow nothing, kink is fine, but it isn’t appropriate in public. You just want to subject people to your kink against your will (which btw flies in the face of safe, sane, consensual.)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          “Narrow nothing, kink is fine, but it isn’t appropriate in public. You just want to subject people to your kink against your will (which btw flies in the face of safe, sane, consensual.)”

          I agree heterosexual cis gender white men have a huge issue with not getting consent! They should really keep their creepy kinks (like for example domestic abuse or racism or making creepy unsolicited comments to women… and girls) out of public spaces.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -42 months ago

            Wait, so you’re fine with domestic abuse, racism, and making creepy unsolicited comments to women and girls, as long as it isn’t in public where you’re subjected to it but kept behind closed doors? Huh, well this took an unexpected turn. So, you’re one of the nazi furries I see.

            Most of society is saying that men doing those things is bad and they should stop, not using them to justify their own immoral behavior subjecting others to their kinks without consent. “Criminals rape people so I should be able to ignore consent too” really isn’t a great position to hold.

            Btw, sexual assault, racism, domestic violence, and catcalling are not “kinks,” something is seriously wrong with you. CNC is, but the first C stands for consensual. Raceplay is, but that also is only between two consenting adults, the rest of the train doesn’t need to hear you call your SO the N-word. BDSM sometimes can involve slapping or paddles and the like, but again that is between consenting adults, the train does not need to watch you smack your girlfriend around even if she says “thank you sir may I have another.” Catcalling, idk, humiliation or praise kink I guess? Still only ok between consenting adults. Seeing a pattern here? CONSENTING ADULTS. Your absolute disregard for consent is frankly concerning.