We’ve all been there.

  • Corhen
    link
    English
    61 year ago

    i wouldn’t even mind if it was 32. 32 is a damn strong password.

    I’ve seen as low as 10 digits in the past

    • @iopq
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      My Wells Fargo password used to be max 8 characters, and when you use the phone you you can basically use the keypad to log in.

      So it’s basically 8 DIGITS

      • Corhen
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        Wow, super secure!

    • @graphite
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      32 is a damn strong password

      Not necessarily: only if it’s generated properly, and only for the moment - that will change in the next few years.

      You do realize that length and symbol type are only 2 out of many other factors that go into a strong password?

      • Corhen
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Ok, fair, not all 32 digit passwords will be secure.

        11111111111111111111111111111111 is not secure, but I was trying to imply, in a properly generated password, 32 digits long is very secure.

        • @graphite
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          but I was trying to imply, in a properly generated password, 32 digits long is very secure.

          I understand, and I think you make a valid point as far as the discussion is concerned.

          It’s unfortunately still a little more complicated than that, though.

          Like I said, there’s more to a password than length and symbol type.

          Even something like cF*+@aXbIdFHje2vZiU-1 is less secure than if it were generated by a good PRNG.

          D0@ndro!dsDr@3@m0f3l3ctr!cSh33p? is also insecure, though it might have been considered secure 4-5 years ago.

          You see what I’m saying?

          Then of course there’s hash algorithms and how those are used to authenticate the passwords themselves, etc.