@[email protected] to Math [email protected]English • 2 months agoBehold a Squaresh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1323arrow-down134
arrow-up1289arrow-down1imageBehold a Squaresh.itjust.works@[email protected] to Math [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish11•2 months agoLol I just read another comment here pointing out that square is a polygon, which requires having only straight lines. I think this would be a stronger argument.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•2 months agoI’m not aware of any shape that is defined by the angles of its outsides.
minus-square@Sterile_TechniquelinkEnglish3•2 months agoI think what the previous poster is saying is that the image does not have four 90° angles, but instead it has two 90° and two 270° angles. …I have no idea if that’s an actual deal breaker, but the logic is sound.
minus-squaredeaf_fishlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoI suspect these lines are straight on a sphere. What we’re seeing is a square on a projected sphere.
Lol
I just read another comment here pointing out that square is a polygon, which requires having only straight lines.
I think this would be a stronger argument.
I’m not aware of any shape that is defined by the angles of its outsides.
I think what the previous poster is saying is that the image does not have four 90° angles, but instead it has two 90° and two 270° angles.
…I have no idea if that’s an actual deal breaker, but the logic is sound.
I suspect these lines are straight on a sphere. What we’re seeing is a square on a projected sphere.