making up shit like saying that I’m arguing in “bad faith.”
I clearly supported my assessment that your defense of Fox News as legitimate is in bad faith. You are free to disregard my explanation, but it does not change reality.
You assert that I am “pissed that Fox News gets away with the bullshit…” I am not angry about Fox News. I am troubled that many gullible people are led to become enraged at innocent people because of made-up stories proliferated by Fox News. These lies lead to oppression and murder of innocent, vulnerable people.
For these reasons, I think it’s important to call out Fox News as illegitimate. Especially after Fox News themselves has publicly admitted they should not be believed “by any reasonable person”. This is a matter of life and death for some vulnerable people who never wanted any trouble.
You were characterizing them as a reasonable source of honest information when you knew they do not see themselves as a reasonable source of honest information.
I never characterized them as such, show me one post where I said that they were a reasonable source of honest information.
No, you ASSUMED that I did. I stand by everything I said. That sir, is NOT bad faith. Now you can argue it ignorant if you want, but it’s not bad faith.
You posted the original link in the first place. Are you now admitting you’ve posted a link to a site that is not a source of honest information? Why would you post a link to a source you know deals in dishonesty?
You just can’t let it go, can you? You’ve been called out over and over and you just can’t stop. No one is reading these. It’s Ok.
I clearly supported my assessment that your defense of Fox News as legitimate is in bad faith. You are free to disregard my explanation, but it does not change reality.
You assert that I am “pissed that Fox News gets away with the bullshit…” I am not angry about Fox News. I am troubled that many gullible people are led to become enraged at innocent people because of made-up stories proliferated by Fox News. These lies lead to oppression and murder of innocent, vulnerable people.
For these reasons, I think it’s important to call out Fox News as illegitimate. Especially after Fox News themselves has publicly admitted they should not be believed “by any reasonable person”. This is a matter of life and death for some vulnerable people who never wanted any trouble.
And that’s fine. But how am I arguing in bad faith if I believe what I say?
You were characterizing them as a reasonable source of honest information when you knew they do not see themselves as a reasonable source of honest information.
I never characterized them as such, show me one post where I said that they were a reasonable source of honest information.
No, you ASSUMED that I did. I stand by everything I said. That sir, is NOT bad faith. Now you can argue it ignorant if you want, but it’s not bad faith.
You posted the original link in the first place. Are you now admitting you’ve posted a link to a site that is not a source of honest information? Why would you post a link to a source you know deals in dishonesty?
You just can’t let it go, can you? You’ve been called out over and over and you just can’t stop. No one is reading these. It’s Ok.
No, I’m saying that YOU are saying that. It’s considered a news source, I don’t think they are always dishonest, and I posted a link.
Accept it. I fucking post what I want. You can choose to accept or feel free to block me. Thanks! :)