You were characterizing them as a reasonable source of honest information when you knew they do not see themselves as a reasonable source of honest information.
I never characterized them as such, show me one post where I said that they were a reasonable source of honest information.
No, you ASSUMED that I did. I stand by everything I said. That sir, is NOT bad faith. Now you can argue it ignorant if you want, but it’s not bad faith.
You posted the original link in the first place. Are you now admitting you’ve posted a link to a site that is not a source of honest information? Why would you post a link to a source you know deals in dishonesty?
You just can’t let it go, can you? You’ve been called out over and over and you just can’t stop. No one is reading these. It’s Ok.
And that’s fine. But how am I arguing in bad faith if I believe what I say?
You were characterizing them as a reasonable source of honest information when you knew they do not see themselves as a reasonable source of honest information.
I never characterized them as such, show me one post where I said that they were a reasonable source of honest information.
No, you ASSUMED that I did. I stand by everything I said. That sir, is NOT bad faith. Now you can argue it ignorant if you want, but it’s not bad faith.
You posted the original link in the first place. Are you now admitting you’ve posted a link to a site that is not a source of honest information? Why would you post a link to a source you know deals in dishonesty?
You just can’t let it go, can you? You’ve been called out over and over and you just can’t stop. No one is reading these. It’s Ok.
No, I’m saying that YOU are saying that. It’s considered a news source, I don’t think they are always dishonest, and I posted a link.
Accept it. I fucking post what I want. You can choose to accept or feel free to block me. Thanks! :)