… That’s why it’s so difficult to remember to do someting every 2nd or 3rd day.

Remembering to do something each day or every 7th day (e.g. every Friday) on the other hand is easy.

  • ValiantDust
    link
    fedilink
    30
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    For a few glorious years there was an alternative that solved all your problems: The French Revolutionary calendar

    10 days per week, 10 hours per day, 100 minutes per hour, 100 seconds per minute.

    The French were serious about the decimal system (thanks for the kilograms though).

    • Fonzie!
      link
      fedilink
      1022 hours ago

      I sincerely want 10h100m100s days, our current imperial system is so shit.

      But then, I do appreciate essentially the entire world being on board with 24h60m60s, that does ease things up a bit.

      • ValiantDust
        link
        fedilink
        721 hours ago

        Much as I love the metric system, I kinda think the moment for changing time units has passed. At the latest when computers became a thing, probably even before that.

        And 12 based systems have the advantage of having having many divisors which is very neat as well. You can divide an hour by 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30 and 60 and end up with an even number of minutes. Then again with a decimal system fractions wouldn’t be so bad.

        • Fonzie!
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I’d prefer base 12, but with given the current state of numeric affairs I’d much prefer metric time over using metric for everything except time (and screen diagonals)

          That way, with decimal time, large scale planning becomes much easier to grasp. This part of the project takes 3.475 days (=3 days, 4 hours and 75 minutes), 200€/h from the customer makes that part days × 2000 = 6950€…

          (and that way I’d just know my laptop’s screen size is 40cm instead of it being marketed as 15.6 Unicorn units while actually being closer to 15.75🦄)

        • @XeroxCool
          link
          17 hours ago

          While I do understand the better divisibility of base 12 and base 60 providing more whole numbers, I don’t know if it really helps anything. 1/6 of 12 is 2 and 1/6 of 10 is 1.666, so on paper, 12 looks clean. But I can’t really gauge dividing something into 1/6 physically any better than if I just try to fill 6 pots equally. Did it really take that long for decimals to be invented?

          The again, it’s too late in the afternoon for me to do 10/6 so I used a calculator. I guess it does help.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            27 hours ago

            Dividing things neatly appeals to some part of the human brain that appreciates order and structures. There’s a certain type of beauty in it. However, when you’re actually measuring, cutting and building stuff, you end up with really messy values, as you are dealing with harsh reality instead of some ideal fantasy.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              159 minutes ago

              Building also ends up weird because the size was based on what ancient Romans did which obviously wasn’t based on any modern system.