• AnIndefiniteArticle
    link
    fedilink
    -22 months ago

    They are!

    Electromagnetically and gravitationally and chemically they act like stars.

    Gas giant simulations are often performed by stellar codes such as mesa. Stellar physics and stellar simulations with fusion turned off. Morphologically, they are stars. We should move on from the cold war brain’s fusion chauvinism.

    They are fundamentally different objects than planets. They have their own planetary systems. They’re stars, just unlit.

    Juno gravity results imply Jupiter’s core is dissolved hydrogen plasma sludge, also known as the dilute core model. Kronoseismology (using saturn’s rings as a seismograph; Cassini read it like a DVD) implies the same is likely true for Saturn due to the discovery of g-mode waves mixing with the f-mode signal detected by ring occultations.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      I wandered in here from computer science, and I’m going back to solving parallel cache coherency for a bit of light relief.

    • zitrone 🍋
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It seems to be the agreed definition in Astrophysics, that in order for a stellar object to be called “Star” it has to have nuclear fusion. While a redefiniton would be possible, there is no need and it would just cause confusion.

    • Flying SquidOPM
      link
      22 months ago

      Literally none of those links talk about “Y dwarf stars.”

      Yep. You’re just a troll.

    • 🐍🩶🐢
      link
      English
      22 months ago

      This is really fascinating! Today I learned.

      • Flying SquidOPM
        link
        12 months ago

        You didn’t learn because none of those links were about “Y dwarf stars,” which are not a thing.

          • Flying SquidOPM
            link
            12 months ago

            I’m sorry the lack of existence of Y dwarf stars makes you angry, but they still don’t exist.