Kamala Harris’s running mate urges popular vote system but campaign says issue is not part of Democrats’ agenda

Kamala Harris’s running mate urges popular vote system but campaign says issue is not part of Democrats’ agenda

Tim Walz, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee, has called for the electoral college system of electing US presidents to be abolished and replaced with a popular vote principle, as operates in most democracies.

His comments – to an audience of party fundraisers – chime with the sentiments of a majority of American voters but risk destabilising the campaign of Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate, who has not adopted a position on the matter, despite having previously voiced similar views.

“I think all of us know, the electoral college needs to go,” Walz told donors at a gathering at the home of the California governor, Gavin Newsom. “We need a national popular vote. We need to be able to go into York, Pennsylvania, and win. We need to be in western Wisconsin and win. We need to be in Reno, Nevada, and win.”

🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

  • @postmateDumbass
    -9•1 month ago

    You think the midwest will have any say in what happens in the USA without it?

    All the campaigns will spend time in NY, California, Texas, and nearby states. Campaign money goes where the votes go. Then government spending goes where the votes are.

    Coroprations will own the midwest while farms exist, and care not about voting because their lobbying is paying the ad spend on the coasts.

    This is a deep issue. The founders may have been white (mostly, remember hamilton isnt an opera) and flawed but they werent stupid.

    • @Olgratin_MagmatoeEnglish
      18•1 month ago

      All the campaigns will spend time in NY, California, Texas, and nearby states.

      As opposed to spending all their time in cities in swing states like they currently do? The EC is an abysmal failure at preventing candidates from ignoring huge swaths of the country. Fuck the EC. What is even dumber about the EC, is that basically every other office in the US counts all votes equally, and yet this isn’t a problem at the state/local level.

      One person, one vote. We are all born equal, all votes should be equal. Nobody is more deserving of a voice than any other.

      Coroprations will own the midwest while farms exist, and care not about voting because their lobbying is paying the ad spend on the coasts.

      That’s already the case.

    • @[email protected]
      17•1 month ago

      Campaign money goes where the votes go. Then government spending goes where the votes are.

      You mean to say, power will be more evenly distributed per person instead of per acre?

      I’m ok with this.

    • AngryMob
      11•1 month ago

      so what? We’re talking about a national vote for president. Your specific voice gets heard through local elections, not the president. Every person should have an equal vote. Period.

    • AFK BRB ChocolateEnglish
      9•1 month ago

      The flip side is that people who live in states with a big land area but relatively small population have a way oversized vote compared to people who live in high population states. Why should a small number of people in the Midwest be able to outvote the majority?

    • @[email protected]
      6•1 month ago

      I want my devalued vote back. Any other rationalization is an assault on “one person one vote”.