Two UN peacekeepers in Lebanon have been wounded by Israeli fire, the mission said on Thursday, as Israel’s military ground operations in the country continued.

In a statement, the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (Unifil) said two of its members were wounded after a Merkava tank fired towards an observation tower at Unifil headquarters in Naqoura, “directly hitting it and causing them to fall”.

“[Israeli] soldiers also fired on UN position (UNP) 1-31 in Labbouneh, hitting the entrance to the bunker where peacekeepers were sheltering, and damaging vehicles and a communications system,” said the peacekeeping mission.

“An IDF drone was observed flying inside the UN position up to the bunker entrance.”

Israeli attacks in Lebanon over the past month, including a bombing campaign and ground invasion, have killed over 1,200 people and displaced one million.

  • @Zacpod
    link
    English
    11 month ago

    Removed by mod

      • @Eximius
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Porque no los dos? Or rather an inseparable blend of both

        • acargitz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Because as usual religion can be used to argue for as well as against a political question. The only self coherent framework that has as its logical conclusion Israeli policy is nationalism.

          Edit: plus, a nationalist explanatory framework is least susceptible to the moral hazard of anti-Semitism. Israeli policy is not exceptional, it’s as banal as Serbian or Azerbaijani ethnic nationalism, revanchism, jingoism and bigotry.

        • JaggedRobotPubes
          link
          English
          41 month ago

          Religion is rarely a problem until it’s conservative, just like politics.

        • @KeeponstalinOP
          link
          English
          51 month ago

          Zionism is a Settler Colonialist Project. Israel has never represented all Jewish people and never will, nor are it’s actions done to benefit all Jewish people. The conflation is itself antisemitic. Adi Callai, an Israeli, does a great analysis of how Antisemitism has been weaponized (see 29:01) by Zionism during its history.

          Ilan Pappe, an Israeli historian, discusses it more in his book

            • @KeeponstalinOP
              link
              English
              01 month ago

              Dude, stop. Conflating the two is responsible for genuine Antisemitism. Antisemites love the conflation because they can then attribute all the war crimes and political influence of Israel to all Jewish people, in order to justify their own antisemitic conspiracy theories. It is genuinely responsible for a rise in hate crimes abroad. Zionism is a form of Fascism that weaponizes antisemitism as a shield for it’s actions.

                • @KeeponstalinOP
                  link
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  I take any kind of hate speech seriously. Racism, Antisemitism, Islamophobia, etc. I’m not going to let any of that slide.

                  • Flying SquidM
                    link
                    English
                    4
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    Please make sure to flag them next time. I only happened to see their post because a different one was flagged.

                    Bigotry is not welcome here. Criticism of Israel in any way is fine. Conflating Jews with Israel is not.

                    Edit: Also, as a Jew who has never supported Israel, their apartheid state or their genocide, I appreciate your defense.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 month ago

      Fucking no. Israel does not represent judiasm. Jews everywhere disavow them. Zionism is not Jewish.

      Claiming that this is Jewish is antisemitism from both Israel and you.

      This is about land, not religion.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        This is about land,

        Wars always are.

        But warring factions almost always use the religion of the people as a strong lever and excuse in order to maintain the support of those people for the war effort.

        This is no different. There have been strong and influential factions (on both sides of the conflict) who have claimed that the piece of dirt they’re fighting over is holy land to both of the religions represented.