@ooli to GamesEnglish • 20 hours agoSteam's new disclaimer reminds everyone that you don't actually own your games, GOG moves in for the killshot: Its offline installers 'cannot be taken away from you'www.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square211arrow-up1689arrow-down131cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1658arrow-down1external-linkSteam's new disclaimer reminds everyone that you don't actually own your games, GOG moves in for the killshot: Its offline installers 'cannot be taken away from you'www.pcgamer.com@ooli to GamesEnglish • 20 hours agomessage-square211cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@TelodzrumlinkEnglish-4•2 hours agoG*mers really don’t want the industry to evaluate the $60 price point and apply inflationary adjustments going back to when it became the standard.
minus-square@InverseParallaxlinkEnglish6•2 hours agoThe $60 was based on 55%+ going to distribution channels, +physical media costs, so it could be down from there.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 hours agoFr tho people seem to forget abt inflation a lot when talking abt the old days
G*mers really don’t want the industry to evaluate the $60 price point and apply inflationary adjustments going back to when it became the standard.
The $60 was based on 55%+ going to distribution channels, +physical media costs, so it could be down from there.
Fr tho people seem to forget abt inflation a lot when talking abt the old days