• Match!!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1131 day ago

    Completely by accident. If squeezing a little more profit had lead to meat taking ten times longer to cook, they would’ve done that

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      301 day ago

      Indeed, profit is the only motive and everything else is an accident. People attribute positive effects to capitalism in the same way horoscopes work.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Sure capitalism might breed efficiency and innovation, well except for when it breeds monopolies, and price fixing rackets, and wage theft, and outsourcing, and enshittification, and horrible pollution, and anti unionization propaganda, and… Wait I forget what point I was going to make.

    • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Counterpoint, while cook time might not make a direct profit like fatter faster-growing chickens do, it would probably still make the chicken more desirable due to the decreased cook time; especially if you could advertise it as a feature.

      "Life’s fast, so why isn’t cooking faster? Are you tired of your chicken taking hours to cook? Buy Bryson’s Chicken Breasts!

      "Bigger!

      "Fatter!

      "Healthier!

      "and faster!

      “Our chicken breasts are designed, formulated and engineered to be as big, nutritious and delicious as possible; while also being faster and easier to cook than other brands. So why spend hours cooking normal chicken breasts, when you could cook Bryson’s Chicken Breasts in a fraction of the time? Buy Bryson’s; you won’t regret it.”

      Edit: misread “faster” as “fatter” lmao. Point still stands though.