@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 day agoConcurrency is not parallelismgo.devexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up185arrow-down12
arrow-up183arrow-down1external-linkConcurrency is not parallelismgo.dev@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 day agomessage-square11fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink20•1 day agoYeah it always bothered me that they’re saying “concurrency is not concurrency”. I’m going to start using “multitasking” instead. That’s so much better. Who’s with me?
minus-square@doughlesslink5•22 hours agoI will typically use the terms asynchronous and parallel when discussing the concepts, but I hadn’t thought about using multitasking until I saw that comment. I mean, even C# calls them “tasks”.
Yeah it always bothered me that they’re saying “concurrency is not concurrency”.
I’m going to start using “multitasking” instead. That’s so much better. Who’s with me?
I will typically use the terms asynchronous and parallel when discussing the concepts, but I hadn’t thought about using multitasking until I saw that comment. I mean, even C# calls them “tasks”.