And anyone who is interested in reading and learning about the history of Hamas will be convinced that it’s not about liberation. It’s about genocide against the Jews.
Argumentum ad populum logical fallacy: being popular doesn’t make you correct. And obviously not many really think that, or Stein would actually be a viable candidate.
Once again, Your refusal to accept reality does not make you correct. And, by the numbers, it doesn’t make you popular either.
Well Dems are definitely worried that enough people will vote for her that it’ll cause them problems. They even started an ad campaign against her! LOL
So like I said originally, “looks like lots of people disagree with you.” If there weren’t lots of people disagreeing with you and voting third party, then you’d have nothing to worry about. Thank you! :)
Like everything you’ve ever said here, that makes no sense.
Dems are concerned she’ll be a spoiler candidate whose votes will help Trump win (and they’re right about that), not that Stein would be a viable candidate— this has been explained to you. You’re conflating the two.
And, more faulty logic:
If there weren’t lots of people disagreeing with you and voting third party, then you’d have nothing to worry about
Once again, Dems aren’t worried she would win or that she’s popular (as neither are true). And it doesn’t take “lots” to spoil the election, just “enough”.
Single-digit percentages - a tiny fraction - does not constitute “a lot” nor “popular”.
Again, your refusal to accept reality does not make you correct. It doesn’t even make you popular.
You are simply wrong about this. Completely wrong, and blindly pretending you’re right. I pride myself on giving people as much benefit of the doubt as possible, but you appear to be willingly trolling now, or you are incapable of learning new concepts and ideas and understanding the consequences of your actions. It’s quite selfish and concerning actually. In any case, I’m done trying. If that was your plan, to tire us out of arguing against your complete lack of logic or willingness to understand reality, then you win. Just know, you’re still wrong about some very fundamental concepts of our society.
Yeah, for Trump. Because that’s what a vote for Jill Stein is.
Your refusal to accept reality in circular logic does not make you correct.
No, they’re voting for Pro-Israel candidate Rachele Fruit. Quoted earlier this year:
No, a vote for Trump is a vote for Trump. A vote for Stein is a vote for Stein.
I’ve already voted. And I didn’t vote for Stein. Or Trump. Or Harris. Thank you! :)
That’s obviously not how it works. You refusal to accept that reality does not make you correct.
https://www.axios.com/2024/09/27/jill-stein-democrats-2024-republicans
It appears lots of people disagree with you. Which is why Democrats are so afraid. Thank you! :)
Argumentum ad populum logical fallacy: being popular doesn’t make you correct. And obviously not many really think that, or Stein would actually be a viable candidate.
Once again, Your refusal to accept reality does not make you correct. And, by the numbers, it doesn’t make you popular either.
Well then you guys and the Democratic Party have nothing to worry about! Right? So no stress. Thank you! :)
How did you arrive at that conclusion? The facts don’t support it. Democrats were ever worried that Stein would be elected.
Well Dems are definitely worried that enough people will vote for her that it’ll cause them problems. They even started an ad campaign against her! LOL
So like I said originally, “looks like lots of people disagree with you.” If there weren’t lots of people disagreeing with you and voting third party, then you’d have nothing to worry about. Thank you! :)
Like everything you’ve ever said here, that makes no sense.
Dems are concerned she’ll be a spoiler candidate whose votes will help Trump win (and they’re right about that), not that Stein would be a viable candidate— this has been explained to you. You’re conflating the two.
And, more faulty logic:
Once again, Dems aren’t worried she would win or that she’s popular (as neither are true). And it doesn’t take “lots” to spoil the election, just “enough”.
Single-digit percentages - a tiny fraction - does not constitute “a lot” nor “popular”.
Again, your refusal to accept reality does not make you correct. It doesn’t even make you popular.
You are simply wrong about this. Completely wrong, and blindly pretending you’re right. I pride myself on giving people as much benefit of the doubt as possible, but you appear to be willingly trolling now, or you are incapable of learning new concepts and ideas and understanding the consequences of your actions. It’s quite selfish and concerning actually. In any case, I’m done trying. If that was your plan, to tire us out of arguing against your complete lack of logic or willingness to understand reality, then you win. Just know, you’re still wrong about some very fundamental concepts of our society.
I gave my opinion. I voted for who I wanted to vote for. And I think everyone has the right to vote for whoever they want to vote for. Thanks! :)
You are boring and since you don’t reply to me anymore you apparently know when you are beat.
Unlike the candidates you choose.