@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 2 days agoScientific Methodmander.xyzimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1724arrow-down13
arrow-up1721arrow-down1imageScientific Methodmander.xyz@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 2 days agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squaremagic_lobster_partylinkfedilink81•2 days agoI usually just cherry pick the data that makes me happy. Works every time.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish20•2 days agoIt’s missing the last two panels where he pulls out a knife and carves up the data
minus-square@chuckleslordlinkEnglish13•2 days agoThat’s how you get your paper published. Find the stat with the happiest (see, statistically relevant) outcome, publish based solely on that.
I usually just cherry pick the data that makes me happy. Works every time.
It’s missing the last two panels where he pulls out a knife and carves up the data
That’s how you get your paper published. Find the stat with the happiest (see, statistically relevant) outcome, publish based solely on that.