• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6123 hours ago

    It’s been a long time since I gave Sony money, but if they did release Bloodborne on PC I would buy it on day one. It seems like emulation will be a reality before that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          610 hours ago

          That means you get the chance of playing the game in exchange of your data or not playing it at all because you live in most of the world where Sony accounts aren’t even available.

          • @Maggoty
            link
            125 minutes ago

            Ahh yeah, that’s a pretty big oversight on their part. You’d think they would want your money.

    • @Jackthelad
      link
      English
      1922 hours ago

      Porting it to another platform, I understand.

      But I can’t understand the clamour for yet another remaster, in a generation full of them.

      • @A_Very_Big_Fan
        link
        English
        917 hours ago

        Superfluous remasters are one thing, but Bloodbourne desperately needs one. I have 2,000+ hours across all of From’s games but I can’t put more than 30 minutes into Bloodbourne before the FPS issues are too irritating for my eyes to keep playing (not hyperbole).

        Fixing that alone would be huge, but porting to PC and giving it the full DSR treatment (QoL + GFX upgrades) on top of that is guaranteed to make enormous profit.

      • Ech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        717 hours ago

        People don’t have a desire for “remasters”, they desire remasters of singular titles. Remasters existing for separate games doesn’t change that, no matter how many there are.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Eh, it’s because of what Bloodborne is, and the state of it. Improper frame pacing with a 30FPS cap, even if you bought a new PS5 to play it (because it’s not available on PS4).

        A cleaned up patch for newer gen hardware to unlock it would be enough, but a remaster is more likely to appeal to Sony.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          417 hours ago

          they should fix their game for free because it is broken in the first place, instead of fixing it then slapping a remastered sticker on it so they can sell it again at full price.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            516 hours ago

            100%. I’m also honestly a bit worried about any remaster they may announce. Bluepoint did a wonderful job in many areas with Demon Souls, but there were definitely some “enhancements” that didn’t exactly match the authorial intent of the original.

            Ideal world, I’d love both, good access to a high quality original, and a top-tier remaster of a classic.

            Fortunately ShadPS4 looks to be saving the day here, by giving us the ability to emulate the original with patches to fix the glaring issues. Still sucks if you’re sitting there on PlayStation though.

            All that said, I don’t expect anyone to touch the original officially. From Soft have moved on, and Sony holds the publishing rights. If BluePoint isn’t interested, it’ll continue to be the elephant in the room.

      • @Broken_Monitor
        link
        821 hours ago

        Upscaling and higher frame rate is all I really want. Sony may do it eventually but lately they have that PSN account requirement bundled in. They always gotta add something shitty to any good they do.

      • magnetosphere
        link
        fedilink
        318 hours ago

        Not much of a gamer myself, but I can understand the appeal of getting an updated version of one’s favorite game.