• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      112 months ago

      You’d say “its nuanced” about colonizers killing indigenous tribes and the indigenous tribes fighting back.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 months ago

          You’re straight up doing it though, like, your nuanced bullshit around Israeli settlers and indigenous Palestinians.

          Consider that you have to keep declaring victory because you’re aware on some level that you’re wrong on this.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              6
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              This you?

              Do you often make up fantasies about strangers on the internet that you lose arguments to?

              Source: https://lemmy.ml/post/21396576/14301383

              That is what your little middle school demonstration of informal logical fallacies are though, you’re substituting arguments for “um actually fallacy” like it is some checkmate that dismisses everything people are saying.

              Notice how you went for an “um actually I didn’t technically say those words” instead of responding to this:

              You’re straight up doing it though, like, your nuanced bullshit around Israeli settlers and indigenous Palestinians.

              Genocide isn’t morally complicated, and the fact that you’re debate broing about it defensively when people say shit that is just objectively correct, like, “Israel is a settler colonial state commiting genocide” is a real indication that maybe you should step back for five minutes and check in with yourself.

              • EleventhHour
                link
                22 months ago

                Whataboutisms and more straw man arguments, with a bit of childish insults thrown in.

                Do you often find that to be an effective debate strategy?