ryujin470 to [email protected] • 2 days agoIs Wiktionary good?message-square9fedilinkarrow-up131arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up130arrow-down1message-squareIs Wiktionary good?ryujin470 to [email protected] • 2 days agomessage-square9fedilinkfile-text
It’s the sister project of Wikipedia, being a dictionary. Being edited by its users it may not be reliable.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•1 day agoIts great, I’d argue its main downfall (lack of popularity) stems a lot from the fact they don’t have any form of API like Wikipedia does. They can’t even agree on a single logo. Otherwise its a great resource.
minus-square@rain_worllink3•23 hours agodon’t they have the exact same software (mediawiki)? therefore same api?
Its great, I’d argue its main downfall (lack of popularity) stems a lot from the fact they don’t have any form of API like Wikipedia does. They can’t even agree on a single logo. Otherwise its a great resource.
don’t they have the exact same software (mediawiki)? therefore same api?