Wayback Machine back in read-only mode after DDoS, may need further maintenance.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 day ago

    Sure, but the networking and consent-finding are defining features of a blockchain. Nobody calls a git repo a blockchain.

    • AlexanderESmith
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You mean a “github repo”. Git by itself doesn’t give a hoot about validating authors what-so-ever (I could sign as “Bill Gates [email protected]”, and git would happily accept the commit), and it’s not federated (multiple people manually downloading various states of the repo at various times doesn’t count).

      Github ensures owners are who they are, as linked to their profile (though email validation only goes as far as “Well, they clicked the link in the email, so this must be their email account”). Github also isn’t federated, since that one site going down takes all the repos with it (unless someone had it cloned, but again, random people downloading at random times yields different states of the repo, depending on when the clone/fetch occured, but then you’d end up with tens/hundreds/thousands of sources of various levels of truth).

        • AlexanderESmith
          link
          fedilink
          311 hours ago

          It’s not a minor nitpick. The comment was that “nobody calls a git repo a blockchain”. It’s because it’s not a blockchain, or even remotely similar to one.

          • chingadera
            link
            English
            27 hours ago

            You are right, I was just poking fun a little. No hard feelings. You did just kind of um akshually my use of um akshually tho

      • @Valmond
        link
        English
        21 day ago

        Github is a website, controlled by no less than Microsoft lol.

        A git repo can be spread out like a “blockchain” without the messy validation and coin earnings, maybe that was the intended comparison?

        • AlexanderESmith
          link
          fedilink
          211 hours ago

          Could it be? Sure, I don’t see a technological reason why someone couldn’t build a system like that.

          Are they now (federated, or blockchained)? No.

          • @Valmond
            link
            English
            12 hours ago

            True.

            I’m working on a decentralised sharing protocol, but it uses reciprocal sharing so you’d have to have large storage anyways.