I told myself I wasn’t gonna do it anytime soon but I distro hopped from Endeavour OS to Arch with Hyprland in the span of 3 days. Nothing against endeavour. I just tried to customize, broke some stuff and decided to try Hyprland again. I’m quite liking it. It takes awhile to get used to it but it’s fun. I cloned a repo for a customized version of it. I don’t know how long I’ll stick with it but wish me luck!

  • @Qpernicus
    link
    English
    21
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • mrh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Yeah Void is fantastic. I just switched back and I doubt I’ll be moving to anything else.

      I only switched away in the first place because I had gotten so comfortable I wanted to try something new (Guix, also amazing!).

      But there’s something so comfy about Void once you grok it, just lots of little good decisions which add up to a great experience.

      • Radin
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        @mrh @Qpernicus it also has a very cool name i switched to it because of that, also do the android dream of ele

    • DigesterOP
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      What Arch based distoe were you on? I would love to spend some time on Debian and OpenSUSE eventually. Also Fedora is intriguing, I wished I tried it already.

      I’ve had experience with Debian based and Arch based distros only. I was on Majaro for months before I had to switch back to windows and leave Linux behind for awhile

      • WheelchairArtist
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        I think when he said arch he meant arch and not arch based?!?

        • DigesterOP
          link
          English
          -21 year ago

          Depends on the distro, something like EOS is basically Arch with fancy pants on.

    • @Raphael
      link
      English
      -31 year ago

      But I was told by the fanboys that Arch never breaks. Could they have lied to me?

      • @Qpernicus
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • @Raphael
          link
          English
          -21 year ago

          But some packages did

          So Arch broke for you.

          • @Qpernicus
            link
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

            • @Raphael
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              When a package is not working as it was intended, the distribution is said to be broken, at least for that package. This is the Debian definition.

              The arch definition is “my bad, jk, it’s not arch’s fault lmao”

          • Aki
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I like the aggression on “fanboying Arch,” while there’s you cherry picking stuff when they’re literally mentioning git packages.

            • @Raphael
              link
              English
              01 year ago

              He said “some of them”, meaning not all packages that broke were -git.

              • Aki
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                I know, but did you ever ask what those packages are? Are they dependencies? Are the packages that broke came from Arch User Repository? Somehow, you immediately ruled out PEBKAC? I don’t know, you’re a Linux user, this stuff is pretty basic no? I don’t get the anti-fanboyism.