• @cheese_greater
    link
    172 months ago

    It applies and should apply no less to the most powerful office and single person in the world

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      82 months ago

      Especially since that person would probably love to remove the term limit so he can stay in power

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 months ago

      Yeah I’m not arguing that. But the point is different… He’s talking about longevity, not acumen.

      • @Kbobabob
        link
        02 months ago

        So now everyone is certain Trump would actually live through the whole term?

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      No, it doesn’t apply, at least not for the same logic. He didn’t say that because the older people are less capable. He said it because a younger person will give you control for longer most likely. They’re lifetime appointments, so the logical choice for maintaining control is to appoint healthy young people, not the most qualified people.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I follow the logic, but I would also argue if the chances are always higher of a sitting President to win the following term, the GOP would have been better off running anyone who had not already held office and can maintain control for a possible 8 years and not just 4? So he would be saying Republicans should have voted for Nicky Haley in the primaries.

        Edit: Nah - I guess that is a bit different, because they could argue idiots already liked him, so he stood a better chance at getting back in and they didn’t believe she could I guess