@[email protected] to Lemmy Shitpost • 5 hours agoI'd have to hear her argument, but...lemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1448arrow-down110
arrow-up1438arrow-down1imageI'd have to hear her argument, but...lemmy.sdf.org@[email protected] to Lemmy Shitpost • 5 hours agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-square@Nurse_Robotlink9•edit-24 hours agoEh, it’s not really that cut and dry. You could debate either way with plenty of evidence, in the end it’s really a limit to the semantics of language Edit: here’s a neat article that talks about it
minus-squareGingaNingalink3•4 hours agoThats pretty neat “you cant kill something thats not alive”. Can viruses respond to stimuli? We consider bacteria alive but viruses are debated, wheres the line? are enzymes alive? Are prions alive? cool article.
Eh, it’s not really that cut and dry. You could debate either way with plenty of evidence, in the end it’s really a limit to the semantics of language
Edit: here’s a neat article that talks about it
Thats pretty neat “you cant kill something thats not alive”. Can viruses respond to stimuli? We consider bacteria alive but viruses are debated, wheres the line? are enzymes alive? Are prions alive? cool article.