• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -19
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The fact there are collateral damage, yes, the fact that is intentional annihilation, nope.

    You want to see what is it for a country loosing its infrastructure during a war? google: “how much infrastructure was destroyed in Iraqi, Syria, Afghanistan ?” And “how”.
    It is not with 2 mortars blowing up a kitchen and fighting on the field.

    Ukrainians still have broadband internet, can shop on Amazon and our officials can travel freely in Kiev.
    Even Sean Penn could deliver in hand his golden toy to a country leader who should be in a bunker instead of making photo-shoot if he or Kiev was really threatened!

    Freaking joke!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Funny how fickle someone’s memory can be. I’m not talking about collateral damage from strikes on military targets, I’m talking about campaign directed against Ukraine’s power grid during last autumn and winter.

      I even remember people here and on lemmygrad cheering on reports of how much of energy infrastructure was destroyed and admiring pictures of dark cities during blackouts. But I guess that didn’t happen? Or maybe the entire thing was fine because it failed?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -411 months ago

        Again, if he was in mass slaughter mode like said on the TV and apparently reddit refugees, your grid would have been wiped out. It’s not an isolated kitchen in city but a whole block that Russia would have destroyed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      that is intentional annihilation, nope.

      What about the children being trafficked from Ukraine to Russia? The murders and systematic raping in Bucha and elsewhere. It’s plainly genocide.