• @Antagnostic
    link
    -221 hours ago

    This tbh, if we don’t want Green votes, make better reasons to them to vote the way you want them to vote. They vote green because they don’t agree with the other candidates. They should fix that instead of complaining about it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          04 hours ago

          Fascism is fascism, not sure what you are on about. A vote for Trump or Jill is just a vote for genocide here with the rhetoric the right is currently spouting. But I guess fuck trans rights, immigrants, the climate, and the economy because your hill to die on is peace in the Middle East. JFC

        • @barsquid
          link
          29 hours ago

          I agree. Voting for Jill will fund the trashcan with one ballot. So I guess I’ll have to take the advice of Uncommitted and vote Harris because I am against Donald instead of for Harris.

            • @davidagain
              link
              -14 hours ago

              Why do you think Donald “finish them” “best King of Israel” “Biden is trying to hold Netanyahu back, he should be doing the opposite” Trump would be better for Gaza, or how do you think anyone other than Harris or Trump could become president, or how do you think that letting Trump win absolves you of complicity? Inaction is a moral choice, and it’s not like you haven’t been warmed that Trump is today the most fascist candidate this close to the presidency in our lifetimes.

            • @barsquid
              link
              -14 hours ago

              The mental gymnastics of… listening to what Uncommitted has asked voters to do?

      • @Shardikprime
        link
        -1220 hours ago

        Bro the overly repetitive usage of that word won’t guarantee you the votes, and worst, may even deter people from voting

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 hours ago

          By most definitions (some require national malitia backing) it’s fascism. Why mince words or pretend the current rhetoric isn’t following the exact same route as previous iterations?