• @Etterra
    link
    English
    319 hours ago

    Ooh, Musky ain’t gonna like this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1018 hours ago

      Hasn’t musk been losing traction in this game for a while now anyway? My understanding is that Tesla’s whole initial selling point was that they disrupted the market and made electric vehicles something that people would want to buy, whilst the other automakers were ‘technically’ making EVs but making them look awful to keep the fuel industry alive.

      Other automakers have woken up to the demand now and are making nice EVs. Unless Tesla can do something innovative that actually works consistently they’re probably going to phase out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        317 hours ago

        made electric vehicles something that people would want to buy

        *people who were considering whether they wanted a Porsche or a Landrover. Selling Teslas to people who had $80,000 dollars to blow in 2015 is orthogonal wide adoption of EVs.

        the other automakers were ‘technically’ making EVs

        It’s worse than that. California passed a law requiring the big automakers offer a non-fossil fuel vehicle. Most companies stuck electric or hydrogen motors in existing cars to make cheap garbage that technically met the requirements. GM spent half a billion developing the EV1. They released for lease-only in 1996 with a 160 mile range. They estimated a starting MSRP of $34,000 by 1999.

        The customers loved them. Then California got rid of the law. And GM canceled the program. Thousands of customers sent checks trying to buy the cars. GM proceeded to revoke all leases, crush the cars, and sell the battery technology to Chevron.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      217 hours ago

      It doesn’t appear that Musk is interested in cheap electric cars. My guess is that the M3 is the smallest Tesla for a while.