• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2319 hours ago

    And how did it end? Was it published? Did they get off the fucking mailing list? Wikipedia doesn’t say.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3616 hours ago

      It does:

      …the paper was reviewed, and its appropriateness for the journal’s publishing criteria was rated as “excellent” by the journal’s peer-review process. It was accepted for publication with minor editorial changes. The paper was not actually published, as Vamplew declined to pay the required US$150 article processing charge. This case has led commenters to question the legitimacy of the journal as an authentic scholarly undertaking.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        711 hours ago

        This case has led commenters to question the legitimacy of the journal as an authentic scholarly undertaking.

        Gotta love the “please don’t sue us” phrasing there.

      • @Viking_Hippie
        link
        English
        8
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        The paper was not actually published, as Vamplew declined to pay the required US$150 article processing charge

        At first I was like “come on! Do it for the bit!”, but then I remembered that, far from having the “make a Broadway sized song and dance number telling mining mogul Bob Murray to eat shit”* money of Last Week Tonight, scientists tend to be less than extravagant in their capital holdings…

        What a way to end the season, though! ❤️😂

        *which was nominated for the Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Original Music and Lyrics in 2020

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        415 hours ago

        Oh, thank you. I stopped reading when it started to talk about someone else 9 years later, I thought it would be some other controversy. I wish he crowdsourced the $150 though. I wonder how many citations it could have gotten…