• @WhyFlip
    link
    English
    151 month ago

    No, it’s not. Has everything to do with sex scenes not adding anything of value to a film.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      111 month ago

      Might have something to do with movies catering more heavily to “Family” audiences (the functional death of the R-rate film in theaters) while TV shows cater more heavily to childless adults.

      We’ve literally coined the term “sexpository” to justify injecting gratuitous naked time into our 8-12 hour prestige TV shows. We’ve also made these sex scenes a lot gayer, which rubs the Family Friendly crowd the wrong way but plays great with the 20-30 somethings who are all on board with it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 month ago

        I think this is it. Most movies are trying to avoid an R rating and slide into PG-13, because PG-13 movies generally make a lot more money than R-rated ones because the audience is greater.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 month ago

      This is at least as true of action scenes, and it doesn’t stop them from bloating the run time of 90% of the movies coming out today.

      • @LaLuzDelSol
        link
        English
        61 month ago

        Sex scenes and action scenes dont necessarily “bloat” movies if they are fun to watch. That’s the whole point, right? To be entertained?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          Agreed, well placed and executed action or sex scenes can be used to great effect. They are also equally capable of adding nothing but wasted time. My point is that bad action scenes have been wasting plenty of time in movies lately, so a desire for tight films with no fat is definitely not the cause for the comparative dearth of sex scenes.