• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I don’t think so. Metadata is unencrypted (i.e. your contacts, who sends messages to whom and how often and when).
    Messages itself are encrypted.

    Am I wrong?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Thanks.

        That is what the article is explaining.

        The planned improvements are a good thing. I thought we talked about the status right/ until now.

        Also: What does it mean then Meta (the company) isn’t eager to collect this data (anymore)? This doesn’t fit my world view of this company.

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          22 hours ago

          They don’ want to moderate contents of your convos, it got expensive.

          They are still mining the meta data to create cohort groups.

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      -35 hours ago

      It uses signal Protocol so it has the same design defect for leaking meta data.

      Both know who and when you are talking too. And thats really all the data the security apparatus cares about.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 hours ago

        I guess that’s right. Although I’m (most likely) not a person of interest for any secret service. But the data could be interesting for marketing and insurance companies.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 hours ago

        Is that really how it works? I thought signal protocol was about just how the encryption worked, not what is encrypted?

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          14 hours ago

          I am not following this.

          Content of msg is encrypted and everything within but signal server knows when you talk to your girl becuase the server has to route it.

          So anytime you initiate a chat, they know that yall doing something.

          This meta data is what the game is all about tho.

            • sunzu2
              link
              fedilink
              12 hours ago

              That’s for a generic court. FISA court order would never see a light of day and they would not waste that being exposed to the public.

              They have technical capability to collect this meta data, that’s a fact.

              We know that that for purpose of this court case they either did not or are under order to not disclose.

              If security apparatus want this information, they can get it. Do you really think singal will say know and violate US law?