• Diplomjodler
    link
    565 months ago

    No, it’s monopoly capitalism. A certain Mr. Marx from Germany had a few things to say about it.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      155 months ago

      One consequence of monopoly capitalism is businesses pursuing growth in revenue more aggressively than growth in user base.

      When the market is saturated, all you can do to pursue growth is to increase unit margin. This eventually leads to production of “fictitious capital” as a stand in for real capital (as paper assets cost virtually nothing to produce).

      Das Kapital goes into lengthy detail about this process. Specifically, the “how much does it cost to make a coat” chapter gets into it in (exhaustive) detail.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      id argue enshittification is a consequence of monopoly capitalism, and not a separate thing.

      • Diplomjodler
        link
        225 months ago

        Sure. But it’s a consequence of monopolisation. Once you break up the monopolies, enshittification will no longer be economically viable.

        • Refurbished Refurbisher
          link
          fedilink
          15
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Monopolization becomes inevitable in a capitalist economy since the wealthy are still the ones with power, and they will always seek to increase their wealth by any means necessary.

          Even in a heavilly regulated form of capitalism, the wealthy will do everything in their power to slowly strip regulations over a period of time where they think people won’t notice and attempt to move public opinion towards the wealthy class’s benefit via propaganda.

          • Diplomjodler
            link
            125 months ago

            I have no idea what you’re trying to say here.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -125 months ago

              I was giving a name to a specific feature of capitalism and you were all “umm actually”-ing me that I’m talking about capitalism.

              That’s like:

              Me: “I really like this chocolate croissant” You: “Actually, you’re talking about a pastry 🤓”

              • Diplomjodler
                link
                75 months ago

                My point is that you were mixing up cause and effect.

                  • @irmoz
                    link
                    English
                    35 months ago

                    By talking about the effect (enshittification) instead of the cause (capitalism). One could read your initial comment and conclude that the only problem is enshittification, and not even think about capitalism as the cause, since you didn’t mention it.