@[email protected] to [email protected] • 10 hours agosocial media rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1433arrow-down17
arrow-up1426arrow-down1imagesocial media rulelemmy.blahaj.zone@[email protected] to [email protected] • 10 hours agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squareTxzKlinkfedilink79•9 hours agoI just love how literary no one involved even acknowledged the existence of Threads lmfao.
minus-squareswitchboard_petelinkfedilink35•8 hours agoliterally is objectively correct in this context
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•8 hours agoI used to see people having some sort of threads number on their instagram profile, now sometimes i forget that even exists lol
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilink3•9 hours agoi haven’t heard of anyone actually using it, but I’ve heard of people using the others
I just love how literary no one involved even acknowledged the existence of Threads lmfao.
Literary or literally? (hint: neither are correct.)
literally is objectively correct in this context
Literaryly
The latter is correct, no?
I used to see people having some sort of threads number on their instagram profile, now sometimes i forget that even exists lol
i haven’t heard of anyone actually using it, but I’ve heard of people using the others
… MILF Messenger?
you did 🙀