• @10_0
    link
    English
    75 hours ago

    OK and? Also source?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      If you’d like to read into this I recommend these books.

      1. “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” by Thomas S. Kuhn

      2. “Science as Social Knowledge” by Helen Longino

      3. “The Politics of Science” by David Politzer

      4. “The Science Industry” by Philip Mirowski

      5. “The Commodification of Science: A Critical Perspective” by various authors

      An example of why this matters would be that research claiming ME was psychological was heavily funded, by both governments and insurance companies because it meant that they didn’t have to spend money on people disabled with ME. No effort was made to look at possible biological causes. Only a couple decades later, we now know it is a neuroimmune disease. But since insurers and government don’t benefit from that fact, it took decades to show and disprove the mountain of research claiming it is psychological. This meant thousands of people died from the disease or were in severe poverty.

      • @10_0
        link
        English
        295 hours ago

        I meant for the femboy getting pounded in the bottom photo

      • @yesman
        link
        English
        35 hours ago

        You forgot Foucault’s Power/Knowledge.

          • @yesman
            link
            English
            11 hour ago

            Do you hate Foucault because your a Marxist or a Petersonian?

            • @GrammarPolice
              link
              English
              11 hour ago

              No i hate him because post-modernism is trash. Peterson doesn’t understand post-modernism, but he is right that it’s trash