@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 1 month ago...lemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square161fedilinkarrow-up1715arrow-down1186
arrow-up1529arrow-down1image...lemmy.blahaj.zone@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square161fedilink
minus-squareDraconic NEOlinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 month agoI mean those things didn’t change, it was just about how research was manipulated by money and human biases.
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish12•1 month agoThe truth doesn’t change. Scientific consensus does. Scientific consensus has been wrong on countless things. After all, science is about getting things a little less wrong every time.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•1 month agoYes but science is a process, not a thing, and that process is corruptible. There is a differentiation between the natural world for how it’s made and the human process that quantifies that knowledge. Science has always changed, just like human culture did
I mean those things didn’t change, it was just about how research was manipulated by money and human biases.
The truth doesn’t change. Scientific consensus does. Scientific consensus has been wrong on countless things. After all, science is about getting things a little less wrong every time.
Exactly.
Yes but science is a process, not a thing, and that process is corruptible.
There is a differentiation between the natural world for how it’s made and the human process that quantifies that knowledge.
Science has always changed, just like human culture did