Maybe it’s not the right place for it, but the mentions of AI safety and safety in general don’t pertain to the actual definition of AI safety as used in AI research. No mention of alignment parameters that are needed to be held to. This reads as a “we need to be careful who gets access to this” vs. any warning to AI companies on their direction and haste.
That’s the nature of privatization. The question isn’t whether we’re building a useful tool but whether someone else is building this Rube Goldberg machine faster.
Market share in what? Doesn’t matter. We have to control it.
Maybe it’s not the right place for it, but the mentions of AI safety and safety in general don’t pertain to the actual definition of AI safety as used in AI research. No mention of alignment parameters that are needed to be held to. This reads as a “we need to be careful who gets access to this” vs. any warning to AI companies on their direction and haste.
That’s the nature of privatization. The question isn’t whether we’re building a useful tool but whether someone else is building this Rube Goldberg machine faster.
Market share in what? Doesn’t matter. We have to control it.