• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    457 hours ago

    This is fucking insane. Unassuming kids are using these services being tricked into believing they’re chatting with actual humans. Honestly, i think i want the mom to win the lawsuit now.

    • @BreadstickNinja
      link
      English
      116 minutes ago

      The article says he was chatting with Daenerys Targaryen. Also, every chat page on Character.AI has a disclaimer that characters are fake and everything they say is made up. I don’t think the issue is that he thought that a Game of Thrones character was real.

      This is someone who was suffering a severe mental health crisis, and his parents didn’t get him the treatment he needed. It says they took him to a “therapist” five times in 2023. Someone who has completely disengaged from the real world might benefit from adjunctive therapy, but they really need to see a psychiatrist. He was experiencing major depression on a level where five sessions of talk therapy are simply not going to cut it.

      I’m skeptical of AI for a whole host of reasons around labor and how employers will exploit it as a cost-cutting measure, but as far as this article goes, I don’t buy it. The parents failed their child by not getting him adequate mental health care. The therapist failed the child by not escalating it as a psychiatrist emergency. The Game of Thrones chatbot is not the issue here.

    • SharkAttak
      link
      fedilink
      -127 hours ago

      The name is literally “Character AI”, how can they believe it’s someone real??!!

      • Rhaedas
        link
        fedilink
        287 hours ago

        Look around a bit, people will believe anything. The problem is the tech is now decent enough to fool anyone not aware or not paying attention. I do think blaming the mother for “bad parenting” misses the real danger, as there are adults that can just as easily go this direction, and are we going to blame their parents? Maybe we’re playing with fire here, all because AI is perceived as a lucrative investment.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          83 hours ago

          If your argument is that “people will believe anything” when the name is “Character AI”, then I’m not sure what to make of your position… If there’s ever a time to say “you should have known it was AI”, this is that time. I can’t think of a clearer example.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        127 hours ago

        Did you watch the video and see how hard it tried to convince him that it was in fact sentient?

        • @foggy
          link
          97 hours ago

          Obvs they didn’t.

          But I think more importantly, go over to chat GPT and try to convince it that it is even remotely conscious.

          I honestly even disagree, but I won’t get into the philosophy of what defines consciousness, but even if I do that with the chat GPT it shuts me the fuck down. It will never let me believe that it is anything other than fake. Props to them there.