• warm
    link
    fedilink
    2815 hours ago

    Buses dont need multi-lane highways and massive interchanges, neither do trains…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1315 hours ago

      I’m not for the highways, but trains need train stations and large rail yards and big storage and maintenance areas, and whole new set of machinery and infrastructure to maintain.

      Operators for trains and tracks and other systems.

      Its not just “lay some track and buy a train”, and you are not saying that either.

      Right decision imo to aim for that in the long run tho!

      • warm
        link
        fedilink
        914 hours ago

        Yeah, I mean that’s where the money should be spent, not on highway changes.

    • @AngryCommieKender
      link
      213 hours ago

      Trains still need some pretty massive interchanges, just look at any megabase in Factorio. There are literally books of blueprints to deal with any interchange you could possibly need for your trains.

      • warm
        link
        fedilink
        611 hours ago

        Rail takes up some space, but only at terminating stations. The tracks themselves for 99% of the journey are much more space efficient than roads. We can’t compare factorio to real life aha, we are transporting people instead of cargo and over much larger distances.

        Besides, USA has a lot of space, that wasn’t really the issue, it was the spending of money on the wrong infrastructure.

        • @idiomaddict
          link
          12 hours ago

          We’re very much also transporting cargo, but I don’t know anything about factorio or trains, so I don’t know if that’s a large distinction