SelfProgrammed to Political Memes · 2 years agoHow dare you...imagemessage-square237linkfedilinkarrow-up11.85Karrow-down147
arrow-up11.8Karrow-down1imageHow dare you...SelfProgrammed to Political Memes · 2 years agomessage-square237linkfedilink
minus-squareZeonlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down20·2 years agoWas he actually convicted of that though?
minus-squarebitjunkielinkfedilinkarrow-up32arrow-down2·2 years agoIt wasn’t a criminal proceeding, but he was found at fault or whatever the civil court equivalent is
minus-squareNateNate60linkfedilinkarrow-up17·2 years agoThe civil court equivalent is being adjudged liable.
minus-squareForeverComical@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·2 years agoMy experience whit those folks is that you can’t extrapolate observations to make conclusions about the past. So basically they throw away any inductive reasoning that would be detrimental to their pet belief.
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoOnly a civil case, not a criminal conviction.
minus-squaremichaelmroselinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoIt means a judge found that enough evidence existed to conclude he more likely than not raped as opposed to beyond a shadow of a doubt same standard of proof as If I did it OJ
Was he actually convicted of that though?
It wasn’t a criminal proceeding, but he was found at fault or whatever the civil court equivalent is
The civil court equivalent is being adjudged liable.
My experience whit those folks is that you can’t extrapolate observations to make conclusions about the past.
So basically they throw away any inductive reasoning that would be detrimental to their pet belief.
Only a civil case, not a criminal conviction.
It means a judge found that enough evidence existed to conclude he more likely than not raped as opposed to beyond a shadow of a doubt same standard of proof as If I did it OJ