• @nomous
    link
    32 hours ago

    It’s called a strawman to build an argument that was never made and then attack it.

    • @Cleggory
      link
      -12 hours ago

      You didn’t make this absurd claim?:

      If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

      If you are victimized, you believe you then have the right to also victimize “to cancel it out”?

      • @nomous
        link
        12 hours ago

        Context is important, that’s how we continue the conversation.

        If Candidate A is a genocidal maniac, and Candidate B is a genocidal maniac. It’s effectively a wash and pointless to say “well Candidate A supports genocide!”

        Hope this clarified my meaning.

        • @Cleggory
          link
          11 hour ago

          Criticizing genocide is pointless if both major candidates support it.

          Apathy has paved a basis for genocide throughout history, your view is not novel nor beneficial.

          • @nomous
            link
            11 hour ago

            Grandoise words that mean little and contribute nothing but obviously you love the smell of your own facts so go off.

            Whatever helps you sleep at night

            • @Cleggory
              link
              133 minutes ago

              Apathy was too big of a word for you??

              • @nomous
                link
                128 minutes ago

                Oh I know lots of defintions. It’s especially useful sniffing out self important jackasses who love to read their own words.