• @Cleggory
    link
    -13 hours ago

    You didn’t make this absurd claim?:

    If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

    If you are victimized, you believe you then have the right to also victimize “to cancel it out”?

    • @nomous
      link
      -13 hours ago

      Context is important, that’s how we continue the conversation.

      If Candidate A is a genocidal maniac, and Candidate B is a genocidal maniac. It’s effectively a wash and pointless to say “well Candidate A supports genocide!”

      Hope this clarified my meaning.

      • @Cleggory
        link
        12 hours ago

        Criticizing genocide is pointless if both major candidates support it.

        Apathy has paved a basis for genocide throughout history, your view is not novel nor beneficial.

        • @nomous
          link
          12 hours ago

          Grandoise words that mean little and contribute nothing but obviously you love the smell of your own facts so go off.

          Whatever helps you sleep at night

          • @Cleggory
            link
            12 hours ago

            Apathy was too big of a word for you??

            • @nomous
              link
              12 hours ago

              Oh I know lots of defintions. It’s especially useful sniffing out self important jackasses who love to read their own words.