@[email protected] to Curated [email protected]English • 1 day agoTake that, atheistsfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1330arrow-down18
arrow-up1322arrow-down1imageTake that, atheistsfiles.catbox.moe@[email protected] to Curated [email protected]English • 1 day agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-squareHonkyTonkWomanlinkfedilinkEnglish9•18 hours agoImplied fact: by distinguishing the baby as Christian, there must be non-Christian babies in close proximity.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•12 hours agoActual Implication: You’re supposed to care more about the Christian baby than a non-Christian babies.
minus-squareHonkyTonkWomanlinkfedilinkEnglish9•12 hours agoUnintended Implication: non-Christian babies are less likely to be hurled.
minus-square@Whats_your_reasoninglinkEnglish3•9 hours agoUnimplied fact: all babies in this scenario are likely to hurl, regardless of their (parents’) denomination.
Implied fact: by distinguishing the baby as Christian, there must be non-Christian babies in close proximity.
Actual Implication: You’re supposed to care more about the Christian baby than a non-Christian babies.
Unintended Implication: non-Christian babies are less likely to be hurled.
Unimplied fact: all babies in this scenario are likely to hurl, regardless of their (parents’) denomination.