@[email protected] to Curated [email protected]English • 2 months agoTake that, atheistsfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up1364arrow-down111
arrow-up1353arrow-down1imageTake that, atheistsfiles.catbox.moe@[email protected] to Curated [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square71fedilink
minus-squareHonkyTonkWomanlinkfedilinkEnglish10•2 months agoImplied fact: by distinguishing the baby as Christian, there must be non-Christian babies in close proximity.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•2 months agoActual Implication: You’re supposed to care more about the Christian baby than a non-Christian babies.
minus-squareHonkyTonkWomanlinkfedilinkEnglish12•2 months agoUnintended Implication: non-Christian babies are less likely to be hurled.
minus-square@Whats_your_reasoninglinkEnglish4•2 months agoUnimplied fact: all babies in this scenario are likely to hurl, regardless of their (parents’) denomination.
Implied fact: by distinguishing the baby as Christian, there must be non-Christian babies in close proximity.
Actual Implication: You’re supposed to care more about the Christian baby than a non-Christian babies.
Unintended Implication: non-Christian babies are less likely to be hurled.
Unimplied fact: all babies in this scenario are likely to hurl, regardless of their (parents’) denomination.